website development mistakes blog header

Website Development Mistakes (Part 3): The Illusion of “Easy” – Technical Debt and the Latency Tax3 min read

January 27, 2026

(Part 3 of 4) Original article, Web Development Mistakes that Cost Businesses Customers (and How to Avoid Them), appeared on January 6, 2026.

The rise of DIY “drag-and-drop” builders has created their own demand in the digital marketplace. While these platforms offer a low initial cost of entry when building a new website, they carry a heavy burden of Technical Debt. These builders achieve their “ease of use” by loading massive, generic JavaScript and CSS libraries which often exceeding 2MB of overhead, resulting in “Code Bloat” that significantly increases Time to First Byte (TTFB) and browser execution time.

For comparison, we’d like to keep your web page sizes measured in KBs (kilobytes), not MBs (megabytes). There are about 1,024 KBs (kilobytes) in 1MB, let alone twice that.

Now, if you were trying to land a jet on an aircraft carrier, then tethering cables to these MB-heavy burdens would be great at slowing you down and keeping your craft on the top deck. But since most all businesses want to grow, these same MB anchors keep you from soaring.

For Top Gun fans, this is the part of the movie where we enter…The Danger Zone.

When a browser encounters a bloated DIY site, it has to parse thousands of lines of unused code before rendering the actual content. This creates a “bottleneck” in the rendering pipeline, leading to high First Contentful Paint (FCP) scores. For a business, this isn’t just a technical nuance; it is a Latency Tax.

Rick Knowlton, UX/UI Designer & Developer at Sharp Innovations, highlights the hidden weight behind these “quick” solutions.

A lot of websites and applications look fine on the surface but behind the curtain they’re dragging a 500-pound weight behind them. Uncompressed images, bloated plugins, a dozen CDN scripts all stuffed into the site header… this is a recipe for a slow, buggy user experience,” said Knowlton. “People flock to drag-and-drop builders like Wix and Squarespace without realizing these tools lack the performance and speed of lightweight, custom, tailored-to-you web applications that not just offer a better experience to your customers but also you as an admin and business owner.”

From a competitive standpoint, this bloat directly triggers Google’s Core Web Vitals penalties. Metrics like Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)—which measures visual stability—are now aggressive ranking signals. A “Custom Build” allows for Tree Shaking (stripping out unused code) and Code Splitting, ensuring the user only downloads the data they need for the specific page they are viewing.

Brian Joly, Web Developer at Sharp Innovations, links this technical performance directly to user retention and the psychology of abandonment.

Slow websites result in frustrated users and increased bounce rates,” said Joly. “Developers should prioritize performance to mitigate user frustration and bounce rates. A poor UI/UX that is difficult and cumbersome to use will lead to frustrated users and increased bounce rates. Developers should carefully consider the UI/UX. Websites should be accessible, responsive, and work well on both desktop and mobile… and use standard, recognizable UI features.”

The economic data is staggering: every 100ms of latency can result in a 7% drop in conversions. For an e-commerce site doing $1M in annual sales, a one-second delay caused by bloated DIY code could cost $700,000 over ten years. Choosing a custom-coded, optimized solution isn’t just a luxury; it’s a defensive strategy against the “Latency Tax.”

Yes, Top Gun fans, this is where Goose & Maverick would sing, “I feel the need. The need, for speed.”

To Rick & Brian, you can be my wingmen anytime.

Read Part One: Why Web Design & Development Fails without Strategic Direction

Read Part Two: Content Killers: The PDF Trap and the Stagnant Site

Sources Consulted